Glossary entry

French term or phrase:

nul pour l\'appelant non comparant

English translation:

no joining of issue / appearance entered/ on the defaulting Appellant\'s behalf

Added to glossary by Cassandra Delacote
Oct 21, 2020 11:13
3 yrs ago
53 viewers *
French term

nul pour l'appelant non comparant

French to English Law/Patents Law (general) Judgment by Court of Appeal
Context:Decision pronounced in a Court of Appeal in Madagascar

LA COUR :
Vu toutes les pièces du dossier ;
Vu les conclusions des parties ;
Nul pour l'appelant non comparant ;
Vu les réquisitions du Ministère Public ;
Après en avoir délibéré conformément à la loi ;

I am not sure what is null and void for the appelant who fails to appear (in Court), and how this fits in with the rest of the text.

I would appreciate the input, explanations and suggested translations of the legal experts out there!

Discussion

Daryo Oct 22, 2020:
"Nul" means here simply that "nothing" was presented as argument by the appellant. (you wouldn't expect much more from someone absent anyway, would you?)

Vu .... = considering / taking into account & similar

Nul pour = "taking into account nothing" for the absentee ... or whatever is the usual formulation to the same effect.
Mpoma Oct 21, 2020:
Sounds like... the appellant just gets no consideration by the court. But the parties' pleadings *are* being taken into consideration. Makes me wonder how many appellants there are: if more than one it might be more understandable.

Proposed translations

+2
2 hrs
Selected

no joining of issue / appearance entered/ on the defaulting Appellant's behalf

Entry of appearance equates with acknowledgement of service of a pleading.

Otherwise, no application / motion and no order / directions issued would come at the end of the judg/e/ment.

Here the French - routinely a woman - judge is angry, but the appeal is not 'caduc', void.
Example sentence:

un appel nul (pour défaut de mention des chefs du jugement critiqué, par exemple), peut, lui, être régularisé par le dépôt d’une nouvelle déclaration d’appel dans le délai imparti à l’appelant pour conclure ..avis Cour de Cassation 20 déc

USA: The Briley defendants answered, thus joining the issues, but failed to appear for trial. Had they appeared, they would have been entitled to present a full defense.

Peer comment(s):

agree SafeTex
1 hr
Thanks, tack and merci.
neutral Daryo : you are going too much into details + can't see any "angry woman judge" in this ST ???
12 hrs
--- pref. into detail in the singular, but you are right. I extrapolated the female preponderance on the French Bench, as remarked to me by a Versailles Court of Grand Instance woman judge, to Madagascar.
agree AllegroTrans
23 hrs
Thanks and merci.
Something went wrong...
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer. Comment: "Thank you for this answer"
-2
2 hrs

Appelant dismissed for failure to appear

my take
Peer comment(s):

disagree Daryo : might be true or not (if an appellant - a person, not a case, could be "dismissed" by a judge at all .., but it's not what it's meant by "nul pour l'appelant non comparant"
11 hrs
Yes! An appelant can be dismissed. The US Supreme court has refused to examine many appeals for many reasons..
disagree AllegroTrans : As we don't actually know the outcome this is guesswork, for all we know the appeal may have been successful (or adjourned to a later date). You cannot make assumptions.
22 hrs
Something went wrong...
Term search
  • All of ProZ.com
  • Term search
  • Jobs
  • Forums
  • Multiple search